What it is
Regulatory status: dietary supplement
A community-added intervention entry. General facts are kept separate from personal usage and tracking.
What it is, why people use it, the evidence, and what to know before trying it.
Regulatory status: dietary supplement
Human evidence for *Rhodiola rosea* is real but **narrow, extract-specific, and methodologically fragile**. The only outcome with repeated placebo-controlled signals is **short-term mental fatigue under load** with **SHR-5 at roughly 170–576 mg/day** (Darbinyan 2000 period-1, Shevtsov 2003 single dose, Olsson 2009); Ishaque 2012 still judged that literature contradictory and high-bias, and the effect sizes are small (Olsson Pines −0.26 vs −0.07). **Depression:** Darbinyan 2007 (340–680 mg SHR-5) looks large and is SHI-funded with a near-inert placebo; the independent Mao 2015 RCT found rhodiola **≈ placebo** (HAM-D −5.1 vs −4.6). **Exercise:** acute 200 mg of a 3%/1% extract or ~3 mg/kg can shave a few tenths of a minute off a time trial or TTE (De Bock, Noreen); **chronic 200 mg/day was null**; Wang 2025’s small pooled VO2max ES (0.32) was **stronger above 600 mg/day**, not at 200 mg. **Cognition** is a fatigue-secondary finding, not a nootropic. **Altitude with *R. rosea* is unsupported**; *R. crenulata* AMS prevention failed in Chiu 2013.
Rhodiola rosea — intervention evidence review is listed as an ingredient or component in these reviewed interventions.
Blueprint
Open intervention