What it is
Regulatory status: dietary supplement ingredient; not an FDA-approved sleep or anxiety treatment
Mechanism evidence: animal
Apigenin binds several molecular targets in laboratory studies, including benzodiazepine-related GABA-A sites and CD38. Human absorption of isolated apigenin is poor, and no human outcome trial establishes that a 50 mg capsule improves sleep.
What it is, why people use it, the evidence, and what to know before trying it.
Regulatory status: dietary supplement ingredient; not an FDA-approved sleep or anxiety treatment
Mechanism evidence: animal
Isolated apigenin at the claimed 50 mg bedtime dose is a mechanism-rich, outcome-poor supplement. The human RCT count for isolated apigenin on sleep, anxiety, NAD+, or cancer is **zero**. The one time ~50 mg of the actual capsule went into people (Borges 2022, n=4), **nothing measurable appeared in plasma** and urinary metabolites were 0.5% of intake. That single PK result undercuts both the GABA-A sleep claim and the CD38/NAD claim at the dose people actually swallow. What *is* supported, and must be kept in a different box: **chamomile extract** has a modest, replicated anxiolytic signal in small GAD RCTs (Amsterdam 2009: HAM-A −3.17 vs placebo; Mao 2016: symptoms held but relapse NS) and a **null** dedicated insomnia RCT (Zick 2011) plus weaker, less-blinded elderly/postmenopausal extract trials. Those extracts delivered **~3–23 mg of apigenin plus the rest of the flower**. Chamomile tea is another step further away (~1–4 mg glycosides plus terpenoids). None of that is a 50 mg isolated-aglycone trial. Cancer evidence is in vitro and animal; the only human neoplasia cohort used 20 mg apigenin **plus EGCG**, was not randomised, and the follow-on RCT was suspended.
Confidence: unsupported
Known side effects, interactions and use limits from reviewed sources.
Human safety data for isolated high-dose apigenin are sparse. It may interact with sedatives, anticoagulants and medicines handled by CYP enzymes; pregnancy, breastfeeding and long-term use have not been adequately studied.
This review does not automatically apply to:
Public protocols that include Apigenin. Open one to see the full context and source.
Amount and timing patterns reported in public protocols; these are observations, not instructions. Private and hidden usage is excluded.
Brand variants reported in public protocols. Private entries are excluded, and inclusion is not an endorsement.
Continue into interventions that appear alongside this one.